Process of assessment

The assessment comprises three stages:

. Stage 1 <Assessment purposes>: to determine the weighting factors.

. Stage 2 <Individual assessment>: to assess all relevant individual performance indicators.

. Stage 3 <Overall assessment>: to compute the overall performance based on the weighting scheme determined in stage 1 and the value of individual performance indicators determined in stage 2.

This is illustrated in the following figure.

figure 1

figure 2

The five performance indicators are influenced by the five building features. Their interactions are considered in the Matrix Tool.

Each of the performance indicators has a value ranging from 0 to 5, with 5 indicating the best and 0 indicating the worst. Once these individual performance indicators are assessed against the relevant building features, the overall performance is computed as below:


where:
are the value of individual performance indicators: Built Environment, Responsiveness, Functionality, Economic and Suitability respectively.
are respectively the weighting factors for individual performance indicators .
And:
The value of IQ specifies the "intelligence" of a building under the "Matool". The maximum value of IQ is 125. The rating of the intelligent building is accordingly specified as follows:

. Bad: <50
. Good: 50 ~80
. Very Good: 80 ~100
. Excellent: 100~125

More details can be found in Handbook Chapter 4

   
HelpDesk
Manufactures Database (external link)
Help Us to Help You

Developed by NextStep